Graphene Oxide in Moderna and Pfizer Covid/19 injections. Spectroscopic Analysis. Dr. Daniel Nagase
All these spectroscopic analysis highlight, unmistakingly, the total absence of RNA, or DNA, in the Covid/19 injections, as per the total absence of nitrogen and phosphorus - in the majority of the samples.
The Covid Spike does not exist. The only Spike which is mutilating and killing the People is the “bio-corona” - or “protein corona”, “molecular corona”, etc - coronating the nano-particles (metallic, plastic, chitosan, etc) when they fuse with human fluids (sperm, blood, milk, etc). I call it a “necro-molecular corona” or a “necro-molecular spike”
There are no protein “Spikes”, coming from the invisible virus, in the CV/19 jabs: only “Molecular Spikes of Graphene Oxide”… or “Molecular Spikes” of whatever nano-particles are injected in the human organism: aluminium, chromium, titanium, silicium, nickel, and so on… ad nauseam.
211 health/science institutions globally all failed to cite even 1 record of “SARS-COV-2” purification, by anyone, anywhere, ever. The Sars-Cov-2 was NEVER isolated.
The Covid Pandemics is a huge PsyOps and the biggest scam of modern History - the official story about the huge Butchery of the second World War being a case apart… as one of the primal goal, of these two world butcheries, was to eliminate tens of millions of useless European small farmers. Cui bono?
These pictures of Raman Spectroscopic Analysis, of Covid/19 “vaccines”, commercialized by Pfizer and Moderna, are coming from the interview by Western Standards of the Canadian whistleblower, the Dr. Daniel Nagase: “Dr. Nagase reviews images from COVID vaccines, shows no elements of life”.
All these Raman Spectroscopic Analysis - made by a Canadian laboratory - point to the presence of Graphene Oxide… and strictly not cholesterol as Ryan Cole, the lab-clown, would pretend. Dr. Daniel Nagase has highlighted, moreover, the fact there is no DNA or RNA in these vials as per the strict absence of nitrogen and phosphorus.
The commentaries proposed, in New-Zealand, by Maurice McGrath PhD, are presented here.
Concerning the Moderna Spectrum 4 (Tubes and Beads), I informed Daniel - who was inquiring about the nature of these objects back in April 2022 - that we are dealing, here, with “Teslaphoresis of carbon nano-tubes”.
Here are some studies:
Teslaphoresis of Carbon Nanotubes: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsnano.6b02313
and a video about it on YT by the Rice University in Texas: “Nanotubes assemble! Rice introduces Teslaphoresis”
The most interesting thing is that for these samples, the only exposure to Teslaphoresis like conditions was from the environment. 6 weeks of driving around from city to city in western canada caused enough electromagnetic exposure within my vehicle that these structures appeared in the vials.
I note your comment on Sasha Latypova's Substack and your criticisms of Jessica Rose, McCullough and others whom you say are gatekeeping for bigpharma. You appear, by implication (I'm not sure, this is my first time reading your posts) to suggest that Latypova is legitimate and looking only for truth? I believe I'm correct in observing that Latypova and Rose, together with several other insiders with suspect motives like Yeadon, collaborated on Project Enigma - How Bad is my Batch now many months ago.
It's only recently that I have been paying much attention to Latypova whom I was inclined by virtue of her connection to Enigma to ignore as a potential misdirection agent. She has come strongly into focus recently owing to her collaboration with Katherine Watt of the Bailiwick News Substack. Watt expresses her reversion to Traditional Latin Mass Catholicism far too consistently with key pointers to her sincerity for me (also a Trad Catholic, therefore I picked up the subtleties) to ignore - she passes my smell test and I can't imagine a misdirection agent having the knowledge or subtlety to pass these tests - God help us if the algorithms can fake that! So I'm accepting Watt's sincerity and therefore there is only (I hope) the consideration of whether she is barking up the right tree or not, rather than misdirecting. Latypova is now getting a hearing from because of her close association with Watt, I'm looking for information that might help me confirm or deny the wisdom of that.
Can you point me to any posts you have written that expand on these points, or comment on the above now please?